Litigation Funding in Divorce Proceedings: New Case in Hong Kong Court

WW v LLN, CACV 524/2019, 25 March 2020, CA (Lam V-P and Au-Yeung J)
[2020] HKCA 178, [2020] HKEC 447

This divorce case is a milestone case about litigation funding in Hong Kong, as commented by a Hong Kong lawyer. It is an appeal against order requiring payment of funding per month without temporal limit and backdating of monthly payments. The court allowed in part of the application.

Please follow and like us:

Hong Kong Matrimonial Lawyer: Latest Cases with court’s comments on FDR Proceedings

WW v LLN, CACV 524/2019, 25 March 2020, CA (Lam V-P and Au-Yeung J)
[2020] HKCA 178, [2020] HKEC 447

This case is regarding matrimonial proceedings in Hong Kong. The judgment contains the court’s comments on unsatisfactory protraction of proceedings, including current practice of trial dates not being fixed until financial dispute resolution (FDR) ended without success which contributed to substantial delay. There is also the court’s observation that family judges should take more proactive role in working out reasonable timeframe, proportionate (both in terms of time and money) in light of overall resources and needs of parties, for whole process of resolution of dispute in Family Court.

Please follow and like us:

Hong Kong Divorce Litigation: Whether Judge is entitled to make substantive FDR Order without consent of parties

CSFK v HWH, CACV 318/2019, 8 April 2020, CA (Lam V-P, Chu JA and Chu J)
[2020] HKCA 207, [2020] HKEC 517

This is a divorce case regarding financial dispute resolution (FDR). Regarding theĀ  order made by judge at FDR hearing, the court is to decide whether judge entitled to make substantive FDR order without consent of parties.

Please follow and like us: