Zero Tolerance Victim Gets Grudging Vindication

A teacher accused of having unauthorized prescription drugs in her car at school has won dismissal of the charges.  She had been charged with having Xanax without a prescription.  She produced proof that the car had been in the shop for a month, that other people had driven it, and that she was drug-free.  In the face of all of that evidence, the District Attorney said only that he didn't think he could prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.  Hardly a gracious statement to an innocent teacher who probably will be paying off her attorney fees for quite a while.

The saga started in February, when the school superintendent of the Houston school district sent campus police with drug-sniffing dogs to search the cars in all employee parking lots.   The searches netted quite a few teachers, including Ms. Herrick.  It would be interesting to see empirical evidence of how many of the teachers charged in that sweep eventually were convicted.  I suspect that the damage to employee morale and lost efficiency from suspending teachers over unfounded charges significantly outweighed any benefit.  

At the time of the searched, a school district spokesman said that the district was treating the employees the same as it would treat students charged with the same offenses. Exactly -- maybe the district should rethink its entire policy of having zero tolerance become zero judgment.

Hat tip: Overlawyered

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.youthserviceslitigation.com/admin/trackback/129780
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.